1.6 KiB
Rojo Design - Protocol Version 1
This is a super rough draft that I'm trying to use to lay out some of my thoughts.
API
POST /read
Accepts a Vec<Route> of items to read.
Returns Vec<Option<RbxInstance>>, in the same order as the request.
POST /write
Accepts a Vec<{ Route, RbxInstance }> of items to write.
I imagine that the Name attribute of the top-level RbxInstance would be ignored in favor of the route name?
CLI
The rojo serve command uses three major components:
- A Virtual Filesystem (VFS), which exposes the filesystem as
VfsItemobjects - A VFS watcher, which tracks changes to the filesystem and logs them
- An HTTP API, which exposes an interface to the Roblox Studio plugin
Transform Plugins
Transform plugins (or filter plugins?) can interject in three places:
- Transform a
VfsItemthat's being read into anRbxInstancein the VFS - Transform an
Rbxitemthat's being written into aVfsItemin the VFS - Transform a file change into paths that need to be updated in the VFS watcher
The plan is to have several built-in plugins that can be rearranged/configured in project settings:
- Base plugin
- Transforms all unhandled files to/from StringValue objects
- Script plugin
- Transforms
*.luafiles to their appropriate file types
- Transforms
- JSON/rbxmx/rbxlx model plugin
- External binary plugin
- User passes a binary name (like
moonc) that modifies file contents
- User passes a binary name (like
Roblox Studio Plugin
With the protocol version 1 change, the Roblox Studio plugin got a lot simpler. Notably, the plugin doesn't need to be aware of anything about the filesystem's semantics, which is super handy.